gerze.blogg.se

Office xp service pack 3 for access 2002 runtime
Office xp service pack 3 for access 2002 runtime











Havent counted them, but I know that modern JVM’s perform very advanced optimizations similar to those of a static C++ compilers. > Do you have any idea how many asm instructions have to be exectued to run a Java app? This is where most of the compiler research are made. However, micro benchmarks like this are not really important for an object oriented application, instead you measure things like object creation and deletion, method dispatching etc. I’ve done some mathematical benchmarks and Java code is typically a few percent slower than similar C++ code. > Have you ever done any profiling of Java code? I dont say that script programs can’t be efficient or stable, but it’s easier to write an efficient and stable program in a statically typed language.Įvery language has it’s use, but some have more uses 🙂 I see dynamically and statically typed languages as fundamentaly different and I dont think it’s fair to compare them to each other. Typically you must perform runtime checks instead, but if you create a big program (10000+ lines of code) this can be VERY time consuming and tedious. – The compilers dont find as many compilation time errors as compilers for statically typed languages (like C, C++, Java etc.). It’s a fact that script languages are a magnitude slower than for example C++. – They are slower than statically typed languages (the compiler cant optimize as much).

office xp service pack 3 for access 2002 runtime

Script languages are dynamically typed which means:

office xp service pack 3 for access 2002 runtime

Some important measurements of a program is efficiency and stability (few bugs). In some programs only the user experience counts, but in others there might be other things that counts. Of those products by the other and, from that perspective, see no With Rugby, but it is targetted towards different markets andĪpplications than Rugby.

office xp service pack 3 for access 2002 runtime

We at RT are as surprised about this as everyone else.Īt the technical level IOS does have some overlap in functionality There was an interesting reply from Holger at REBOL in response to everyones questions as to why Maarten did it: Thank you all for using it and making it a fun.

office xp service pack 3 for access 2002 runtime

With IOS coming Rebol will have a built-in distributed system. (including republishing) as the BSD license indicates if you stil have it. Rugby is officially dead, the web sites have been removed. Rugby, the distributed request broker for the REBOL platform has been ‘mysteriously’ dropped by its creator Maarten.













Office xp service pack 3 for access 2002 runtime